Showing posts with label social media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social media. Show all posts

Saturday, 1 September 2018

What would Jesus post - Book review

This was a really interesting book to read and review. There are so many conflicting thoughts and opinions around about social media and the whole online world. Some people think it's the best thing since sliced bread, a fabulous gospel opportunity, a way to reach out and spread the good news and connect with people you wouldn't otherwise meet. Some people think it's the work of the devil, all about spreading lies and hate and evil, bringing out the worst in people and distracting us from the real work of the kingdom. The truth, inevitably, probably lies somewhere in between those two extremes. Like many things, social media and the internet can be used for good or for evil, and there are plenty of people and organisations doing both of those things.

It would be easy to assume that the Bible has nothing to say about the online world - after all computers and electricity couldn't even have been dreamed of during the time the Bible was written, let alone the internet. But it's vital as Christians that we consider what God thinks about all aspects of life, and that we weigh up what we do and say and think in the light of what we know to be true. This is what theology does - it enables us to look at an aspect of life in our world and to consider it within the gaze of God, asking ourselves what he wishes to say to us about it.

This is what David Robertson has sought to do in this new book: What Would Jesus Post? - A Biblical Approach to Online Interaction. Personally I'm a big fan of social media, as you'll know if you follow me, and have been assailed by multiple posts on anything from chocolate to church to squirrels to fencing to gin to Jesus... and much more! So I was fascinated to read what David Robertson had to say, and to see what he thought Jesus would have made of the world of social media.

My own view is that Jesus would have been all over social media - he was never one to shy away from a chance to interact with people, after all. He was always where the people were - even when that meant being in a place that the 'good', righteous, religious people felt that he shouldn't have been. Of course Jesus would have used his social media accounts without sinning, as he did everything - unfortunately that's something I can't claim to have always managed, and I doubt whether any of us have. But in 2018 I simply don't think that we can declare the whole online world to be morally bankrupt and declare that we want nothing to do with it. The internet isn't going anywhere, and I believe that we need to understand it and engage with it - in a way that's shaped around and formed by what we know to be true of God's kingdom rule. So what might that look like?

I really liked how practical the book was, and that it's structured in such a clear and readable way. It constantly refers back to the truths and wisdom of the Bible, and it is also totally up to date and relevant to 21st century life and culture. There are helpful tips about how we can all make better use of social media in our kingdom ministry, and there are also important challenges as to just how we come across, how we engage, how we  interact. We're reminded to "pray before posting" and to think about the responsibilities as well as the opportunities that come with having a "personal digital pulpit."

The overall advice from this book is that it's important for Christians as individuals, and for churches as organisations, to engage on social media, and to make the most of all that is offered by it. But crucially we're also encouraged to be wise, discerning, humble, hospitable and generous as we do so. There's also a really important and interesting challenge about our overuse of/reliance on all things online, and an encouragement to consider an occasional "digital sabbath." Ultimately, we're reminded that we are "stewards of a digital footprint."

Overall I think this is an important and timely book for Christians. I haven't come across anything quite like it before and it definitely gave me a lot of food for thought. I'm very much pro all things internet (well, most things...!) but this has given me some important new ideas, and questions to ask, for which I'm grateful.


Wednesday, 7 December 2016

Social media, instant news and how we communicate

When I was 19 I went off on a gap year to Borneo for 7 months.  Email was only just beginning to be a thing (gosh that makes me feel old!), and so I was just about able to email home once a week if the computer decided to behave. My parents didn't have a computer so would check it at their friends' house. I phoned home weekly (I expect their phone bill was horrifying). And that's basically all the 'keeping in touch' I did.

I'm currently on sabbatical and spending 10 weeks in the US. I spent 2 1/2 weeks being a tourist in New York, Virginia and Washington DC, and am spending the rest of the time in Lancaster California, visiting a church led by my good friends.

I was reflecting on the fact that communication has changed so much during that time. My gap year was 19 years ago (oh my gosh, I'm now twice as old as when I did my gap year. AAARGH!). Now, in order to keep in touch with people back home, I write blogs on my tablet which I instantly post online via WiFi.  I post updates and photos on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. My family and friends at home know what I'm doing almost as I'm doing it. They're in touch with my news and I'm in touch with theirs. Plus I'm in touch with actual news - I know what's going on in the world all the time thanks to Twitter newsfeeds, news websites, and my newspaper subscription.

What has this communication revolution done for the way we interact with and treat one another, I wonder? I love social media - I'm an extrovert, and I really enjoy being in touch with people even when I'm on the other side of the world, and being able to share my news and hear theirs. But it's fundamentally changed how we communicate, and definitely not always in a good way.

I find myself being actually quite glad that all these communication media didn't exist 19 years ago. I don't think that spending 7 months working in a remote Borneo village would have felt like quite as much of an adventure if I'd been able to post photos every evening and see all that I was missing out on day by day from home. It made it feel more special to be away and pretty much out of contact for that time, and coming home with news, stories and pictures was exciting.

Having said that though I admit that I'm glad social media does exist now. It's really helped while being here to be able to keep in touch with people at home. In a new place, far away from home, settling in, finding my way around, making friends, having new experiences, it's been great to be able to share those and have people comment and interact.

A silly example of this was when I slipped and fell on a wet air vent on a Washington DC pavement. I was very English about it, leaping up to insist I was fine, but actually I'd really hurt myself! Posting about it on social media, and getting friends from home sending sympathy (and lots of teasing too!) really did make me feel better.

Also, as I'm travelling alone, posting photos and stories really helps to feel that I'm sharing the experience with someone else, which massively reduces any feelings of loneliness (so big thanks if you've commented on any of my posts - thanks for being my virtual travel companions!)

I don't know how much social media usage is correlated with personality but I know that for me as a single, living-alone, extrovert activist, connecting with the world on social media is a massive help in reducing loneliness and enabling me to extrovertly process my head! Of course I have to make sure it doesn't also take over my life and either become an idol, or stop me from actually enjoying the experiences in real time in the first place - but as long as I do that, for me at least, I think it's a great thing.

Having said all of that though, I've also been doing a lot of thinking lately about how we communicate with one another on social media. Really it's all still pretty new, and it has changed how we interact and communicate so fundamentally. Sometimes I scroll through my news feed and am moved to tears, heartened, encouraged, and blessed. Sometimes I am horrified, appalled, angered and ashamed. And sometimes of course I'm just laughing at cats scared of cucumbers (if you've never seen it, do yourself a favour and get on YouTube right now - you won't regret it).

I love it when social media introduces me to an idea that's new, when I discover a talk or book that I want to check out, when I see a quote that really speaks to me, when I'm challenged to think about something in a new way. I love it when people come together to campaign for change and something brilliant and heartwarming happens (the recent story of the dad trying to find a replacement sippy cup for his autistic son, and Tommee Tippee agreeing to make a lifetime's supply, was one of the most amazing examples of this that I've seen). I love it when twitter banter is at its daftest and funniest, spreading jokes and cartoons and silliness. I love it when people stand shoulder to shoulder with people in need, even if they don't know one another. I love it when people stand up to bullies and trolls and haters, when they refuse to let abuse go unchallenged.

But gosh, social media can also be an awful, horrible thing, can't it? It can be a place of abuse and nastiness and evil and ignorance and bullying. I honestly think that sometimes people forget that they're writing ONLINE - that potentially the whole entire world is watching and reading what they say. Surely that's the only explanation for some of what we see?

I hate it when social media is used to bully and oppress certain groups in society. I hate it when it's used to spread ignorance and fear and to stir up violence. I hate it when it's used as an anonymous shield to hide behind while threatening people for holding a certain viewpoint. I hate it when people just SHOUT out their own opinion again and again without actually listening to what the other person is saying (or thinking about how they might be feeling). I'm horrified when a lot of the time I see Christians treating each other online in these ways - if we can't be loving and gracious and generous to each other online then what hope do we have?

So is social media and the massive change in how we communicate and interact online a good thing or a bad thing? Well clearly it's impossible to answer that really - it's both, and much more besides. It's a massive blessing in so many ways, but we really must be careful and wise as we engage with it.

And a reminder of the good stuff, to end with:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-38141319

Saturday, 18 June 2016

If this were a test of our humanity, we'd have failed

I'm struggling to find the words for what I want to say, and yet I know that I want, and need, to say something. Like everyone, I have been shocked, and horrified, and saddened, at some of the events of the past few weeks. Some truly terrible things have happened. I have wept as I've watched the news, as I'm sure you have too. I have turned on the TV, or looked at social media and though "no... not again... not another tragedy."

Many excellent blogs and articles have been written on some of those tragic events, by people much wiser than me. I don't want to write about the events themselves, awful as they are. I pray for everyone involved - for peace, for healing, for comfort, for grace, for hope. And yet what I actually have been mostly thinking about over the last day or so, and what I want to try to blog about, is "our" reaction - how we, the public, have responded and reacted to these dreadful events.

Of course, in doing that, I run the risk of making huge generalisations. Obviously there have been a variety of responses, and I will only have personally come across a handful of them. (I'm aware also that in commenting on what I see as some very negative reactions, I run the risk of doing the very thing that I want to discuss and critique - I will try to steer clear of that risk!).

I think, though, that what has struck me the most, again and again, as each new tragedy has unfurled (and in the EU referendum debate, which is obviously in a different category, but nonetheless has been all over every form of media recently), is the way in which people have responded. (Again, I'm referring of course to the negativity - I do appreciate that there have also been (some) moments of beauty and kindness...).

As I have reflected on all this, a phrase came to me this morning - if the events of the last month or so had been a test of our humanity, we'd have failed. (For the avoidance of doubt, and to see off any obvious arguments, I am NOT saying they are 'a test' of any kind - but please allow me the metaphor for the moment).

What do I mean by this? Well, do any of the following look or sound familiar?

The EU Referendum campaign is underway and of course feelings and opinions are strong. Passions are running high. It's right that different views are shared online and in person. This matters. It's a massive issue and one which will have profound implications for our country for generations to come. We live in a democracy, thank God - we're all able to speak and to vote freely and we can be certain that the vote will be done fairly and the result enacted properly. I urge everyone eligible to vote - it is a freedom and a privilege that many have been and are denied.

And yet... some of the things I have heard people say, in person and on TV and on social media, have shocked and horrified me. The way individual people - not opinions, not viewpoints, actual people - have been vilified and disparaged has been quite awful. [Don't get me wrong - some of the 'official' people within the campaign have done things that have horrified me too, and I believe both in allowing free speech and in calling out hatred and prejudice. But always, these are people. Real, human people.]

The same could be true of the US election campaign. I personally know less about the issues involved there, of course, and obviously I don't get a vote - but again, the ways in which people (on all sides, and at all levels) are speaking of, to and about one another, is horrifying.

This week we've also seen, of course, a dreadful hate crime - a horrifying attack on an LGBTI nightclub in Orlando. And we've seen the senseless, brutal murder of a woman who dedicated her life to helping ordinary local people, refugees and asylum seekers, those living in poverty - a murder which leaves a man widowed and two small children without a mother.

There have been awful responses to those two events too, I'm sad to say. Some of the things I've heard or read about them have caused me to shake my head in despair. Some have simply been vile - comments coming from a place of ignorance, hatred and prejudice. But some have been more subtle in their horror - the comments which at first sight seem sympathetic, but actually are seeking to win political points, to in some way capitalise on the grief and the torment.

What has happened to us as a society? Is social media in some way to blame? Perhaps, though of course that cannot explain it all. I am a single extrovert who lives alone - I love social media! I love to interact with others through it, to share my views, to read and listen to others'. But perhaps we're in danger of becoming too anonymous this way, too far removed from the issue itself, and from the people with whom we're debating. Perhaps it's too easy to forget the issue involves real people, and those with whom we're speaking are also human, with lives, and families, and friends, and hopes, and dreams, and feelings.

Is the actual media to blame - the press, journalists, newspapers? Again, perhaps in part. Some of the headlines I have read have made me feel sick. The journalists involved are culpable here. Today I have seen a number of tweets posting photos of some of the recent tabloid headlines, suggesting that by reading so much hate in this way, 'we' (society) come to feel and to express hate as a result. I think to an extent this must be true - for some people the only way they engage with news and world affairs is by reading one newspaper. per day or per week. If that newspaper irresponsibly spews out vile hatred and prejudice, the person reading will inevitably be influenced by that. What can be done to better regulate the nastiness and bias of some of our print media?

And yet even if 'media' is in some way to blame, that cannot be the whole story. We are grown ups. We all make our own decisions. We have all been brought up with values of some kind. We all exist together in this society. We all mix day by day with a whole mixture of different people with whom we might agree or disagree. We must take responsibility for our words, or actions, or views. We must consider the effect that the things that we do and say and write will have on the people around us. We must remember that other people are, well, people - human beings just like us, worthy of respect and kindness.

I pray that if it's possible for some good to come out of the horrors the world has experienced in these past days, and out of the roller coaster surrounding the EU Referendum, whatever its eventual outcome, that it might be this - that we would all be a bit kinder, a bit more patient, a bit more gracious, a bit more ready to listen and to love.

As Brendan Cox said in his remarkable statement following his wife's death: we must now "unite to fight against the hatred that killed her."

The hatred must not win. We must overcome it with our humanity.

Sunday, 29 May 2016

On being an extrovert

Yikes - sorry for the ridiculously long time since I last posted! Not quite sure what happened there... I have a long list of 'things to blog about' on my desk so hopefully in the next few days/weeks I'll crack on a bit and there will be a few more blogs to read.

Anyway, the thing I've pondering a lot lately is the whole introvert/extrovert thing. I'm totally fascinated by this!

It will come as absolutely no surprise to anyone who knows me that I am a massive extrovert - whenever I do any sort of quiz I end up pretty much off the scale! But, even though it seems totally obvious now, for years I didn't know this about myself. And it really helps now that I do!

Obviously we can't be totally defined by these 'personality test' type things - there's much more to us than just a collection of numbers or letters churned out by answering a few questions. Of course saying that I'm an extrovert and someone else is an extrovert doesn't mean we'll behave in the same way. And don't even get me started on the ridiculous misconception about extrovert = loud and outgoing, and introvert = shy. That's just misusing words!

But, having said all that, I have found the concept of extroversion and introversion really helpful to understand myself (and my friends) much better.

For me, this is some of what being an extrovert looks and feels like:
  • I process things externally. Ideally this would be by chatting to someone in person, although it could also be over the phone. Journalling and social media work well too, especially at times when the 'other person' option just isn't available!
  • I relax and unwind by being with other people. Even if I've had a really busy day or week, the way I will most easily feel relaxed is by doing something with other people. We don't need to be having a big chat - just being alongside others can work. Generally, though, this will help me unwind much better than being on my own.
  • I don't know what I think about something until I've talked about it. Genuinely! I know that sounds a bit mad but it's true. I need to talk things over and 'think out loud' in order to work out what my opinion is.
Much about being an extrovert is great - it's who I am, and that's fine. I like being around people, I know how I tick, it's all good.

But of course there are also some bits of it that are really tricky. And that's especially true as a single person, and as someone who lives alone. Getting in from a tough conversation, or a tough meeting, or a tough day, and having no one to talk to about it is - well, it's tough! There are times when I so want there to be someone there to talk to, because I know if I can talk it through I'll be able to get my head round it in about half an hour, as opposed to the week it'll take me doing it alone!

That's when social media can be amazing! If you follow me on Facebook, Twitter or Instagram you probably sometimes think "what's she on about now, posting some inane bit of nonsense from her life" (unless you're also an extrovert, in which case it's all good, we can be social media social butterflies together!). Oh, and if you're not, and you are thinking that, I'm not sorry btw - if you don't want to know the inane details of my life, feel free to not follow me any more ;-)

This is also where my nearest and dearest friends come in - bless them! I have a mix of very extrovert and very introvert friends, but whoever they are, if our friendship is going to last, they've had to get used to my extrovertly processing and over sharing all over the place - the text messages and Twitter DMs which go on for 2 pages, and the late night splurges when I just need to get something out of my brain.

I'm trying to learn how my introvert friends and colleagues tick, and give them the time and space that they need to process and sort their heads out too. (On that, if you haven't read my friend Mark Tanner's book 'The Introvert Charismatic', you really should...)

I'm a bit of a slow learner, so I'm still figuring out stuff about myself in this area - like why I rarely ask questions after lectures, even though (not-really-a-spoiler-alert) I'm quite gobby ;-) Turns out it's because, if the lecture finishes and we're immediately invited to ask questions, I don't yet know what I think, because I haven't been able to process it. Whereas, if we're given 5 minutes after the talk to chat to the person next to us (which I realise is introvert hell!), I'll be able to process the talk, work out what I think, and then ask a question.

I'm trying therefore, whenever I speak, to offer both options so that both introverts and extroverts can make the most of it.

Now it's quite possible that this whole blog post has just been one long extrovert-process-think-out-loud exercise. I'm ok with that. I love figuring out a bit more about who I am and how I tick and what makes life work better for me. Maybe it'll help someone else along the way too...